Pohang, South Korea Metro Area Population 1950-2023
Chart and table of population level and growth rate for the Pohang, South Korea metro area from 1950 to 2023. United Nations population projections are also included through the year 2035.
- The current metro area population of Pohang in 2023 is 365,000, a 0.55% increase from 2022.
- The metro area population of Pohang in 2022 was 363,000, a 0.55% increase from 2021.
- The metro area population of Pohang in 2021 was 361,000, a 0.56% increase from 2020.
- The metro area population of Pohang in 2020 was 359,000, a 0.56% increase from 2019.
| Other Cities in South Korea |
| City Name |
Population |
| Seoul |
9,988,000 |
| Busan |
3,472,000 |
| Incheon |
2,849,000 |
| Daegu |
2,181,000 |
| Daejon |
1,577,000 |
| Gwangju |
1,529,000 |
| Suweon |
1,365,000 |
| Yongin |
1,136,000 |
| Goyang |
1,105,000 |
| Changwon |
1,054,000 |
| Seongnam |
942,000 |
| Ulsan |
913,000 |
| Bucheon |
827,000 |
| Ansan |
767,000 |
| Cheongju |
727,000 |
| Cheonan |
703,000 |
| Jeonju |
665,000 |
| Anyang |
561,000 |
| Siheung |
447,000 |
| Uijeongbu |
424,000 |
| Gumi |
396,000 |
| Pohang |
365,000 |
| Gwangmyeong |
349,000 |
| Jeju |
347,000 |
| Gimhae |
318,000 |
|
Pohang - Historical Population Data
|
| Year |
Population |
Growth Rate |
| 2023 |
365,000 |
0.55% |
| 2022 |
363,000 |
0.55% |
| 2021 |
361,000 |
0.56% |
| 2020 |
359,000 |
0.56% |
| 2019 |
357,000 |
0.56% |
| 2018 |
355,000 |
0.85% |
| 2017 |
352,000 |
0.86% |
| 2016 |
349,000 |
0.87% |
| 2015 |
346,000 |
0.87% |
| 2014 |
343,000 |
0.88% |
| 2013 |
340,000 |
0.59% |
| 2012 |
338,000 |
0.90% |
| 2011 |
335,000 |
0.90% |
| 2010 |
332,000 |
0.91% |
| 2009 |
329,000 |
0.92% |
| 2008 |
326,000 |
0.62% |
| 2007 |
324,000 |
0.93% |
| 2006 |
321,000 |
0.31% |
| 2005 |
320,000 |
-0.62% |
| 2004 |
322,000 |
-0.92% |
| 2003 |
325,000 |
-0.91% |
| 2002 |
328,000 |
-0.61% |
| 2001 |
330,000 |
-0.60% |
| 2000 |
332,000 |
0.61% |
| 1999 |
330,000 |
0.30% |
| 1998 |
329,000 |
0.61% |
| 1997 |
327,000 |
0.31% |
| 1996 |
326,000 |
0.62% |
| 1995 |
324,000 |
0.31% |
| 1994 |
323,000 |
0.62% |
| 1993 |
321,000 |
0.31% |
| 1992 |
320,000 |
0.31% |
| 1991 |
319,000 |
1.92% |
| 1990 |
313,000 |
3.99% |
| 1989 |
301,000 |
3.79% |
| 1988 |
290,000 |
4.32% |
| 1987 |
278,000 |
3.73% |
| 1986 |
268,000 |
5.51% |
| 1985 |
254,000 |
8.09% |
| 1984 |
235,000 |
8.29% |
| 1983 |
217,000 |
8.50% |
| 1982 |
200,000 |
8.11% |
| 1981 |
185,000 |
8.19% |
| 1980 |
171,000 |
8.23% |
| 1979 |
158,000 |
8.22% |
| 1978 |
146,000 |
8.15% |
| 1977 |
135,000 |
8.00% |
| 1976 |
125,000 |
7.76% |
| 1975 |
116,000 |
8.41% |
| 1974 |
107,000 |
8.08% |
| 1973 |
99,000 |
8.79% |
| 1972 |
91,000 |
8.33% |
| 1971 |
84,000 |
7.69% |
| 1970 |
78,000 |
8.33% |
| 1969 |
72,000 |
7.46% |
| 1968 |
67,000 |
8.06% |
| 1967 |
62,000 |
8.77% |
| 1966 |
57,000 |
7.55% |
| 1965 |
53,000 |
8.16% |
| 1964 |
49,000 |
8.89% |
| 1963 |
45,000 |
7.14% |
| 1962 |
42,000 |
10.53% |
| 1961 |
38,000 |
8.57% |
| 1960 |
35,000 |
6.06% |
| 1959 |
33,000 |
10.00% |
| 1958 |
30,000 |
7.14% |
| 1957 |
28,000 |
7.69% |
| 1956 |
26,000 |
8.33% |
| 1955 |
24,000 |
9.09% |
| 1954 |
22,000 |
10.00% |
| 1953 |
20,000 |
5.26% |
| 1952 |
19,000 |
11.76% |
| 1951 |
17,000 |
6.25% |
| 1950 |
16,000 |
0.00% |
